Consultations & Comments
Reader Reaction and Timely Answers From Experts
The scarcity of child psychiatrists and developmental pediatricians in our rural community is one of the reasons why I do prescribe antipsychotics for young children. I am trying to make a difference.
—— Mark Weinreb, MD
Thank you so much for your comments. I will address each concern individually. First, in real-life practice, pediatricians and pediatric practitioners frequently receive just a snippet from parents who expect that advice will be provided. All antecedents and necessary data are often not available. Yes, it is valuable to obtain information on other environments; however, even if the behavior is
occurring exclusively in one environment, it warrants intervention—if not diagnosis. Similarly, although it is important to inquire about possible etiological factors (such as family history and psychosocial stressors), they do not change the fact that intervention is warranted while the search for a cause continues. Our intention for this brief vignette was to target a dramatic concern in one environment, based on a real-life parental report. Broader excursions would naturally follow and would be elaborated on in the context of a complete review.
Second, LP is a school psychology trainee and her perspective is a valuable one. In the interprofessional approach, we learn terminologies that our colleagues in other disciplines use; “label” is an educational term used in service-driven models, and “diagnosis” does not come into play. You might have experienced this in your own community, when an autism diagnosis by a professional does not equate to an autism label in schools. School psychologists do not venture into diagnoses such as depression and autism, because these diagnoses do not determine behavioral interventions, functional analyses of the behaviors do.
Ample research in the field of behaviorism supports the idea that behavior often serves a relatively few number of functions, although topographies can be dramatically different. You and I could argue whether this preschooler had “early stages of bipolar disease” because experts in child psychiatry dispute the validity of such a construct in young children. Excessive aggression more than typical for age is in the eye of the beholder; and one of the criteria for a mental health disorder is impairment of functioning in an environment.
Third, I do not dispute the lack of specialist availability in rural communities, having myself practiced in rural Kentucky for 5 years. Nor do I disagree that all of us pediatricians try to make a difference in our communities in the face of scarce support and resources. However, prescribing antipsychotics for young children is fraught with problems, even in the face of good intentions. The adverse-effect profile of these agents and lack of extensive literature denoting effects for specific target symptoms in this age-group makes good behavior management with etiological evaluation a better option.
As a board-certified developmental-behavioral pediatrician for 10 years with extensive psychopharmacology experience, I continue to have great respect for the atypical antipsychotics; as described in our Parent Coach feature, they are one of a variety of tools in the treatment of children with disruptive behavior. However, it takes only one patient with tardive dyskinesia or diabetic unmasking to make one reconsider use of these medications in young children.
—— Neelkamal Soares, MD
University of Kentucky College of Medicine